Succession Planning for Clubs: Avoiding the 'Only Sarah Knows How' Problem

07/21/2026

Every long-running club has at least one of these. The treasurer has been in the role for eleven years and nobody else knows how the bank account is structured. The webmaster set up the site six years ago and nobody else knows how to make changes. The event chair has run the big annual event so long that the entire institutional memory of how it works lives in her head. They are, in every case, wonderful and dedicated people. They are also single points of failure. Carrying that much alone takes a toll, too. A volunteer who holds an entire job in their head can quietly burn out, and the more one person carries, the bigger the gap when they step away.

An older club volunteer writing notes by hand in a notebook beside a laptop and a stack of papers.

Succession planning sounds like a corporate concept, but at its heart it's a simple question. If the person currently doing this job had to stop tomorrow, could someone else pick it up without the whole thing falling apart?

For most small clubs, the honest answer to that question is "probably not, in a lot of places." And the honest path to fixing it doesn't require a big project. It requires a series of small, steady habits.

Why "only Sarah knows how" happens

It happens for good reasons, not bad ones. Sarah volunteered. Sarah was willing. Sarah did the work. Over time, the club quietly shifted more and more of the relevant knowledge into Sarah's head, because that was the easy thing to do and because Sarah kept showing up.

Nobody decided this was a bad idea, because for as long as Sarah is around, it isn't a bad idea. It's only a bad idea when Sarah leaves, or when Sarah gets sick, or when Sarah retires from the role and the next person stares at the job and has no idea where to start.

This isn't a failure of the individual. It's a failure of the club to invest in continuity. And it's one of the most common quiet crises in small-club governance. It's also hard on the volunteer. Someone carrying far more than their share gets worn down and frustrated over time, and an overloaded person is more likely to step away suddenly, which is the exact moment a missing backup hurts most.

And in the hardest cases there's no warning at all. A longtime volunteer can fall seriously ill or pass away, and a club that has leaned on one person for everything ends up grieving and scrambling at the same time. Succession planning can't soften that kind of loss, but it can keep the practical side from becoming a second crisis on top of it.

What succession planning actually means (for a small club)

For a small club, succession planning doesn't mean boardroom-level strategy. It means something much more practical:

  • Knowing who does what
  • Knowing what they know that nobody else does
  • Having that knowledge written down in a form someone else could pick up
  • Having at least one other person familiar enough with each role to step in if needed

That's it. Four things. Not a big formal program, just a set of small habits that keep the club resilient.

Identifying single points of failure

The first step is a short honest audit of the current state. For each role on your board or key volunteer position, ask:

  • If this person were to stop tomorrow, who would take over?
  • Is this person carrying more than is reasonable for one volunteer to sustain?
  • Does that second person actually know enough to do the job?
  • Where is the knowledge and the access documented?
  • Is there anything this person does that isn't written down anywhere?

You're looking for gaps. For each one, you don't need an immediate solution. You just need to know it's there. The list of "things we don't have a backup for" is the starting point for everything else.

Writing things down

The single most valuable succession-planning activity is just writing things down. Every role on the board should have a short document, a couple of pages and not a binder, that covers:

  • What the role involves. A plain-language description of the responsibilities, written by the person currently in the role.
  • Recurring tasks and their timing. "Every month, I check the bank reconciliation on the 5th. Every quarter, I prepare a financial summary for the board. Every year, I prepare the annual report by January 15."
  • Who to contact for what. "The person to talk to at the bank is Dana, and her direct line is saved in the club contacts. The contact at the insurance company is Marco."
  • Where things are. Where the records are stored, where the logins live (by reference to the access map, not by sharing actual passwords), where the physical documents are kept.
  • Known gotchas. "The monthly payment from the big sponsor arrives on different dates, so don't panic if it's late. It usually shows up by the 20th."

This document doesn't need to be formal. A plain text document or a Google Doc is fine. What matters is that it exists, that it's accurate, and that it's stored somewhere the club can find it later.

Writing this up takes a current officer about 60 to 90 minutes. That's it. Ninety minutes to make the club dramatically more resilient.

The shadow role pattern

Written docs help, but the other piece of succession is having an actual person who knows enough to step in.

One of the most effective patterns here is the "shadow" role. For each major role on the board, there's a designated shadow, a second person who shares in some of the actual work, sits in on relevant discussions, and would know what to do if something happened.

Shadow roles can be formal ("assistant treasurer") or informal ("Mike handles part of the treasurer's work and could step in if needed"). Treat the shadow as someone in training, learning the work by doing part of it now, so taking over later is a continuation rather than a cold start. What matters is that they do a real, regular piece of the job, not just sit in on meetings. A shadow who never touches the work slowly drifts out of date, and the role slides back into one person doing everything, because there's no day-to-day reason to keep anyone else current. Doing some of the work for real is what keeps the knowledge live, shares the load, and makes a genuine handoff possible later.

The benefits are real:

  • If the primary person gets sick or steps down, there's no crisis.
  • The primary person has someone to talk to about decisions without the whole board getting involved.
  • Sharing the work keeps any one person from carrying too much, which protects against burnout.
  • The shadow is a natural successor when the primary eventually moves on.
  • Knowledge transfer happens gradually over time, not in a rushed handoff.

Not every role needs a formal shadow, but the most critical ones, like treasurer, membership chair, webmaster, and event chair, usually should.

Two people at a wooden table reviewing a printed document together, one pointing to the page.

Building continuity into normal activities

Succession planning also happens in small ways inside normal club activity, when it's done on purpose.

Vary who runs things. If the same person has run the annual event every year for a decade, it's worth quietly involving someone else in the next one, not to replace them, but to spread both the knowledge and the workload so no single volunteer is left carrying the whole thing alone.

Invite observers into meetings. If an incoming board member is going to take over a role next year, having them sit in on the current person's work for a few months makes the eventual handoff much easier.

Document as you go. When something new happens, like a new vendor, a new process, or a new workaround for a tricky situation, write it down then, not later. "Later" never comes.

Share what you know. A surprising amount of "only Sarah knows" happens because being the only one who knows quietly feels important and valued, not out of any malice. Clubs are healthier when knowledge is shared, and a culture of documenting and passing it on is something the board can gently encourage.

Planning ahead for when someone steps down

Eventually, everyone steps down. The best time to plan for that is long before it happens. A year of lead time is ideal for a major role, enough time to train a successor, document the work, and transfer relationships with outside contacts.

If someone is getting close to stepping down, the board should be having open conversations about it. Not pressuring them to leave, just asking, "When you're ready to step down, how can we make sure the club is in good shape for whoever comes next?" Most longtime officers actually welcome this conversation. It's a way to ensure their work isn't lost.

Where Clubistry fits in

A club management platform can carry a lot of the knowledge that would otherwise live only in one person's head. Membership records, payment and renewal history, documents, roles and access, all of it lives in one place, available to whoever has the right access, and still there for future board members even after the current ones have moved on. That continuity is part of why having a proper system matters, not because today's board needs it, but because tomorrow's board will be grateful.

The Members and Documents areas, and the roles that control who can see and do what, are the most directly relevant. But the biggest continuity gain comes from a simple habit, writing things down, keeping them current, and making sure more than one person knows where they are.

Nobody ever thanks a board for doing succession planning well. The payoff is invisible. Things just keep working. But it's one of the most quietly important things a well-run club can do, and it's almost entirely within reach of any small board that decides to take it seriously.

« Return to ALL ARTICLES

Start your free Clubistry site today.

Try Clubistry free